Talk:Wachovia Tract

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

--Higgercabin 04:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote.

This article is at "Wachovia, North Carolina." Hatnotes are only necessary if there's some confusion- if Wachovia redirected here, and Wachovia the bank was at Wachovia (bank), then that'd be fine. But if you got to this article, it was intentional, or via some link. There's no risk of accidentally ending up here and meaning to be at the bank article. SnowFire 05:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Performed

I would like to make a few notes on why I performed a move. I assumed no controversy, as this article needs cleanup and has not been improved in some time. I would ask that anyone seeking to move back to Wachovia, North Carolina assume that there will be controversy, and use WP:RM to move this page. At the time it was create, all sources indicate that this tract was known as "Wachovia", "Die Wachau", or "the Wachovia Tract". Modern histories have adopted the latter terminology, and most importantly, grouds such as the Moravian Archives have too (see: {http://moravianarchives.org/history/wachovia-map/}). I believe that "Wachovia, North Carolina" was misleading, as it might lead a reader to believe that a place called by that name still exists. I believe my move was supported by WP:NAMINGCRITERIA and WP:COMMONNAME, as well as WP:PRECISE.Cdtew (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]